• Home
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
Las Vegas Contractor Board AttorneyLas Vegas Contractor Board Attorney
Las Vegas Contractor Board AttorneyLas Vegas Contractor Board Attorney
  • HOME
  • CONTRACTORS BOARD
    • LICENSING
      • License Application Denied by Contractors Board
      • Nevada Legislature Creates New Handyman License
      • Nevada Contractor Licensing Roadblocks
      • Overcoming Criminal History Secure License
    • DISCIPLINARY
      • Abandonment
      • Administrative Citations
      • Authority Of NCCB To Impose Penalties
      • Defending
      • Disregard Plans And Specs
      • Failure To Maintain Records
      • Failure To Pay For Services
      • Fight Nevada Contractors Board And Win
      • Five Most Common Contractor Board Mistakes
      • NCCB Disciplinary Process
      • NCCB License Renewal
      • Nevada Contractors Board In District Court
      • Nevada Manufactured Housing Section Complaints
      • NSCB Disciplinary Actions
      • Notice Of Investigation From Contractors Board
      • System for Award Management Exclusions
      • Why Hire Attorney Defend Action By Contractors Board
    • UNLICENSED CONTRACTING
      • Contractors Board Overview
      • Facing Criminal Charges Online Ad Citations
      • Who May Submit Proposals
  • FOR LAWYERS
    • Nevada Contractor Licensing & Regulatory Co-Counsel
  • CIVIL LITIGATION
    • BUSINESS TORTS
      • Contract Intentional Interference
      • Deceptive Trade Practices
      • Slapp Back
    • CONSTRUCTION LAW
      • Bid Protests
      • Civil Litigation
      • Construction Contracts
      • Construction Litigation
      • Contractor Pitfalls
      • Defending Union Alter Ego Claims
      • Mechanics Liens
      • Miller Act and Little Miller Act
      • Payment / Private Construction
      • Payment on Public Works Project
      • Termination For Convenience Clauses
    • CONTRACT DISPUTES
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Collection of Attorney Fees
      • Injunctions
      • Uniform Commercial Code
    • REAL ESTATE
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Right of Redemption
  • JOHN H WRIGHT
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT

Wright Law Group Supreme Court HOA Victory

Wright Law Group Victory HOA Cases Nevada

August 1, 2017 Supreme Court Win HOA Retroactivity

THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP WINS A SUPREME COURT VICTORY FOR HOA CASES IN NEVADA

Court Hands Down Powerful Decision Concerning Retroactivity

In an important  Nevada Supreme Court decision issued on July 27, 2017, the Court handed down a powerful decision concerning the retroactivity of their previous decision in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank N.A. (2014). The new case is captioned K&P Homes v. Christiana Trust and veteran trial attorney John Henry Wright, Esq. of The Wright Law Group P.C. secured  a  another win for HOA foreclosure investors in the state of Nevada. This victory materialized when the Supreme Court held that SFR Investments applies retroactively to all foreclosures since NRS 116’s inception . You can read the whole opinion at the Supreme Court of Nevada site HERE.

In K&P Homes , the Nevada Supreme Court answered the certified question from United States District Court for the District of Nevada that asked “Does the rule of [ SFR Investments] that foreclosures under NRS 116.3116 extinguish first security interests retroactively to foreclosures occurring prior to the date of that decision?” As mentioned above, the Court answered the question in the affirmative thus effectively clarifying that the Court’s jurisprudence in SFR applies to all HOA foreclosures in Nevada past, present, and future starting from the date NRS 116 became effective.

SFR Was A Huge Win For HOA Investors

“SFR determined whether the Nevada Legislature, through NRS 116.3116, established ‘a true priority lien such that it’s foreclosure extinguishes a first deed of trust on the property’… In concluding that NRS 116.3116 established the true superpriority lien, this [Nevada Supreme] court did no more than interpret the will of the enacting legislature.” K&P Homes v. Christiana Trust 113 Nev., Advanced Opinion 51. p.5 (July 27, 2017) (internal citations omitted). When it came down, SFR was a huge win for HOA investors suing the banks for quiet title of the recently acquired properties. One argument the banks were using (and sometimes winning) was the theory that SFR ’s decision did not apply to foreclosures that occurred before date of that decision. K&P Homes clarified the fact that ALL foreclosures successfully effected under NRS 116 will extinguish the bank’s first position lien and the investor will take title free and clear of the banks interest.

This is an important decision because it removes yet another argument the banks like to raise when attacking HOA investors or defending against HOA investor’s quiet title actions. Morever, this decision vindicates the rights of HOA investors – past, present, and future – under NRS 116 and makes purchasing foreclosure property at an NRS 116 auction that much safer for the buyer. Finally, this decision was made by the entire Nevada Supreme Court en banc so there is almost no chance of this decision being challenged again in Nevada.

The Wright Law Group, P.C. was responsible for winning this huge victory in the Nevada Supreme Court and many others in Clark County District Court and the United States District Court for the district of Nevada. John Henry Wright, Esq. as the founder of The Wright Law Group, P.C. is an well versed in HOA foreclosure litigation in Nevada. If you need to quiet title against a bank or are served with a complaint to quiet title filed by a bank, call us now at (702) 405-0001 to arrange a consultation.

Date 08-01-2017
Time 1:04PM

Tags: Supreme Court Retroactivity
Share
2

Recent Posts

  • Demand A Jury Trial In A Nevada Administrative Proceeding February 6, 2025
  • Nevada Mechanics Materialsmans Lien July 20, 2019
  • NV Supreme Court Published Opinion September 29, 2018
  • Changes In Record Sealing October 31, 2017
  • NRS 116 Does Not Conflict With FHA Mortgages August 2, 2017
  • Wright Law Group Victory HOA Cases Nevada August 1, 2017
  • Nevada Supreme Court Issues New Decisions On HOA Super Priority Liens March 17, 2016
  • Recovery Of Attorney’s Fees In Criminal Cases Attorney Las Vegas July 16, 2015
  • Banks Going After Homeowner’s Association (HOA) Foreclosure May 13, 2015
  • Las Vegas Civil Forfeiture Attorney October 13, 2014

Tags

Banks Come After Innocent Purchasers Banks going after Agencies Conducting Foreclosures Las Vegas Nevada banks ignoring super priority lien civil forfeiture attorney Contractor Liens Defendant Recover Attorneys Fees financial institutions First Deed of Trust HOA HOA Attorney HOA foreclosures Home Owners Association Las Vegas HOA Lawyer litigation expenses Mechanics liens Nevada Liens Laws Nevada Supreme Court nevada Supreme Court Ruling FHA Mortgagas Quiet Title Recent Record Sealing Changes Shorter Waiting Super Priority Lien Supreme Court Retroactivity Trial In A Nevada Administrative Proceeding
Contact The Wright Law Group, PC CLICK FOR CONTACT PAGE

CLICK TESTIMONIALS

TESTIMONIALS

Contact Info

  • John Henry Wright
  • The Wright Law Group, P.C.
  • 2340 Paseo Del Prado Building D Suite 305 Las Vegas NV 89102
  • (702) 405-0001

SEARCH SITE

logo martidale hubbell preeminent

Legal Disclaimer

The opinions expressed at or through this Web site are the opinions of the individual author and are for informational purposes only.  The information is not for the purpose of providing legal advice and is not to be acted on as such.  Communication of information by, in, to or through this Web site and your receipt or use of it is not provided in the course of and does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between The Wright Law Group, P.C. and the browser.  Nor is it intended as a solicitation.  It is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney.  You should not act upon any such information without first seeking qualified professional counsel on your specific matter.  The hiring of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon Web site communications or advertisements.  The materials presented in this Web site are intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be current, or up to date and should not be taken as an indication of future results.

Social Connect

© 2023 · The Wright Law Group, P.C.

Site Design by Digi Dezine

  • Home
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
Prev Next

Press Enter to search · Esc to close