• Home
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
Las Vegas Contractor Board AttorneyLas Vegas Contractor Board Attorney
Las Vegas Contractor Board AttorneyLas Vegas Contractor Board Attorney
  • HOME
  • CONTRACTORS BOARD
    • LICENSING
      • License Application Denied by Contractors Board
      • Nevada Legislature Creates New Handyman License
      • Nevada Contractor Licensing Roadblocks
      • Overcoming Criminal History Secure License
    • DISCIPLINARY
      • Abandonment
      • Administrative Citations
      • Authority Of NCCB To Impose Penalties
      • Defending
      • Disregard Plans And Specs
      • Failure To Maintain Records
      • Failure To Pay For Services
      • Fight Nevada Contractors Board And Win
      • Five Most Common Contractor Board Mistakes
      • NCCB Disciplinary Process
      • NCCB License Renewal
      • Nevada Contractors Board In District Court
      • Nevada Manufactured Housing Section Complaints
      • NSCB Disciplinary Actions
      • Notice Of Investigation From Contractors Board
      • System for Award Management Exclusions
      • Why Hire Attorney Defend Action By Contractors Board
    • UNLICENSED CONTRACTING
      • Contractors Board Overview
      • Facing Criminal Charges Online Ad Citations
      • Who May Submit Proposals
  • FOR LAWYERS
    • Nevada Contractor Licensing & Regulatory Co-Counsel
  • CIVIL LITIGATION
    • BUSINESS TORTS
      • Contract Intentional Interference
      • Deceptive Trade Practices
      • Slapp Back
    • CONSTRUCTION LAW
      • Bid Protests
      • Civil Litigation
      • Construction Contracts
      • Construction Litigation
      • Contractor Pitfalls
      • Defending Union Alter Ego Claims
      • Mechanics Liens
      • Miller Act and Little Miller Act
      • Payment / Private Construction
      • Payment on Public Works Project
      • Termination For Convenience Clauses
    • CONTRACT DISPUTES
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Collection of Attorney Fees
      • Injunctions
      • Uniform Commercial Code
    • REAL ESTATE
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Right of Redemption
  • JOHN H WRIGHT
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT

Nevada Contractors Board In District Court

WRIGHT LAW GROUP RACKS UP ANOTHER WIN AGAINST

THE NEVADA CONTRACTORS BOARD IN DISTRICT COURT

One of The Wright Law Group’s clients recently experienced a situation where the Contractors Board was so determined to discipline a contractor that the Nevada Contractors Board was willing to ignore the Nevada Statute of Limitations to support what the District Court identified as “Ad Hoc Rule Making.”  Fortunately, the District Court was not having it.

In the fall of 2017, the contractor had negligently removed and stored asbestos containing materials in violation of the Federal Clean Air Act and the Nevada Department of Environmental Quality (“NDEQ”) regulations.  The contractor was cited by the Clark County Air Quality Control Board and at a hearing in the spring of 2018, the contractor agreed to pay a fine of $34,000.00.  As it turned out, agents of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) were in attendance at the hearing before the Air Quality and Control Board and the EPA subsequently conducted its own investigation.

After a couple of years of negotiations with the U.S. District Attorney’s office, a Plea Agreement was reached and the contractor and its project manager each pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor count of Negligent Endangerment under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(c)(4).

In January of 2024, more than six years after the negligent act, the Contractors Board filed an administrative Complaint against the contractor for allegedly having committed a “fraudulent or deceitful act” alleging that the contractor had not been truthful with the Clark County Air Quality Control Board and the EPA during the 2018 investigation.  This complaint was lodged by the Board to the Board .

The Wright Law Group filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint based on the running of the statute of limitations. However, at the hearing, held in February of 2024, the Board’s counsel argued  that it was not the wrongful conduct in 2017 upon which the Plea Agreement was based.  Instead, in a complete Ad Hoc manner, the Board argued that it was the act of entering into the Plea Agreement that is the conduct that formed the basis of the Complaint, thus attempting to avoid the applicable 4 year statute of limitations.   At a hearing before a Board the Hearing Officer applied a non-existent tolling provision in an attempt to find a way for the complaint to work , ultimately issuing a disciplinary order against the contractor.

Fortunately, The Wright Law Group, filed a successful Petition for Judicial Review in the Clark County District Court in accordance with NRS 233B.130(1)(b).  At the hearing on judicial review the District Court set aside the disciplinary order and admonished the Contractors Board, stating first and foremost that the Board could not be an injured party and therefore, should not have brought its own complaint.

Second, the District Court found that the Board had engaged in Ad Hoc Rule Making, in clear violation of a Nevada Supreme Court decision titled Silverwing Development v. Nevada State Contractors Board from 2020, which held that the Board cannot engage in ad hoc rulemaking and that no deference is owed to the Board’s interpretation of statutes and regulations.

Board To Return All Fine

The District Court ordered the Board to return all fines, fees and costs that the Board had ordered the Contractor to pay resulting from the citation.

Fortunately, the contractor was successful in its petition for review.  However, that is not always the case and a contractor must take care to retain knowledgeable and experienced counsel to ensure that their rights are protected, because the Contractors Board does not always play fair.  Sometimes, as shown here, the Board may even make up a rule, or incorrectly interprets a rule, to obtain their objectives.

The Wright Law Group has decades of experience defending claims and protecting the rights of contractors against such vexatious conduct by the Contractors Board and others.  If you find yourself at odds with the Contractors Board don’t go it alone.  Contact The Wright Law Group at 702-405-0001  and protect your license.

Contact The Wright Law Group, PC CLICK FOR CONTACT PAGE

CLICK TESTIMONIALS

TESTIMONIALS

Contact Info

  • John Henry Wright
  • The Wright Law Group, P.C.
  • 2340 Paseo Del Prado Building D Suite 305 Las Vegas NV 89102
  • (702) 405-0001

SEARCH SITE

logo martidale hubbell preeminent

Legal Disclaimer

The opinions expressed at or through this Web site are the opinions of the individual author and are for informational purposes only.  The information is not for the purpose of providing legal advice and is not to be acted on as such.  Communication of information by, in, to or through this Web site and your receipt or use of it is not provided in the course of and does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between The Wright Law Group, P.C. and the browser.  Nor is it intended as a solicitation.  It is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney.  You should not act upon any such information without first seeking qualified professional counsel on your specific matter.  The hiring of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon Web site communications or advertisements.  The materials presented in this Web site are intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be current, or up to date and should not be taken as an indication of future results.

Social Connect

© 2023 · The Wright Law Group, P.C.

Site Design by Digi Dezine

  • Home
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Sitemap
  • Contact

Press Enter to search · Esc to close