• Home
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
Las Vegas Contractor Board AttorneyLas Vegas Contractor Board Attorney
Las Vegas Contractor Board AttorneyLas Vegas Contractor Board Attorney
  • HOME
  • CONTRACTORS BOARD
    • LICENSING
      • License Application Denied by Contractors Board
      • Nevada Legislature Creates New Handyman License
      • Nevada Contractor Licensing Roadblocks
      • Overcoming Criminal History Secure License
    • DISCIPLINARY
      • Abandonment
      • Administrative Citations
      • Authority Of NCCB To Impose Penalties
      • Defending
      • Disregard Plans And Specs
      • Failure To Maintain Records
      • Failure To Pay For Services
      • Fight Nevada Contractors Board And Win
      • Five Most Common Contractor Board Mistakes
      • NCCB Disciplinary Process
      • NCCB License Renewal
      • Nevada Contractors Board In District Court
      • Nevada Manufactured Housing Section Complaints
      • NSCB Disciplinary Actions
      • Notice Of Investigation From Contractors Board
      • System for Award Management Exclusions
      • Why Hire Attorney Defend Action By Contractors Board
    • UNLICENSED CONTRACTING
      • Contractors Board Overview
      • Facing Criminal Charges Online Ad Citations
      • Who May Submit Proposals
  • FOR LAWYERS
    • Nevada Contractor Licensing & Regulatory Co-Counsel
  • CIVIL LITIGATION
    • BUSINESS TORTS
      • Contract Intentional Interference
      • Deceptive Trade Practices
      • Slapp Back
    • CONSTRUCTION LAW
      • Bid Protests
      • Civil Litigation
      • Construction Contracts
      • Construction Litigation
      • Contractor Pitfalls
      • Defending Union Alter Ego Claims
      • Mechanics Liens
      • Miller Act and Little Miller Act
      • Payment / Private Construction
      • Payment on Public Works Project
      • Termination For Convenience Clauses
    • CONTRACT DISPUTES
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Collection of Attorney Fees
      • Injunctions
      • Uniform Commercial Code
    • REAL ESTATE
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Right of Redemption
  • JOHN H WRIGHT
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT

NV Supreme Court Published Opinion

civil litigation attorney
Civil Litigation Attorney Las Vegas

NV Supreme Court Published Opinion

September 29, 2018 First Position Deed Of Trust

John Henry Wright of The Wright Law Group, P.C. Scores Major Win for Homeowners in Nevada Supreme Court Case, Wells Fargo, N.A. vs. Radecki.

On September 13, 2018, The Wright Law Group, P.C. secured a major Nevada Supreme Court victory in Wells Fargo, N.A. vs. Radecki, a case declaring quiet title for a purchaser of a property at a valid foreclosure sale which extinguished the bank’s first position deed of trust.  Ruling in favor of The Wright Law Group, P.C.’s client, the Court unanimously rejected the assertion that the foreclosure sale should have been invalidated.

Banks hate the laws that govern HOA foreclosure sales.  Banks hate the often low sales prices at the HOA foreclosure sales.  As a result, banks refuse to let go of a property without a fight.  So, banks come after innocent purchasers and try to keep them chained to the bank’s deed of trust.

In this case, Wells Fargo, argued that the foreclosure sale should have been invalidated on equitable grounds, namely that the foreclosure sale constituted a fraudulent transfer under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), that the foreclosure deed failed to transfer ownership of the property, and that the deed was defective.

Wright Explained That Radecki Was An Innocent Third-Party Buyer

In response, Wright dismantled Wells Fargo’s arguments and persuaded the entire Nevada Supreme Court to side with his client, Radecki.  He argued that Wells Fargo’s equitable grounds argument failed to show that fraud, unfairness, or oppression affected the sale price.  Wright explained that Radecki was an innocent third-party buyer.  When challenged, Wells Fargo failed to show that the HOA’s client engaged in any misconduct, that the HOA’s agent acted in any way that compelled Radecki to bid lower, or that any part of the foreclosure process prevented other, higher bids.  Next, Wright exposed Wells Fargo’s UFTA argument as frivolous.  Of course, the UFTA did not apply because the property at issue was not an “asset” as defined by state statute.  An “asset” means property of a debtor, but the HOA transferring the property was a creditor, not a debtor.  Again and again, Wright shielded his client from the bank’s most outrageous arguments.  Needless to say, the Court found Wright’s arguments highly persuasive.

Justice Stiglich, Writing For The Court, Disagreed With Every Last One Of Wells Fargo’s Arguments

In a 7-0 decision that will be published, Justice Stiglich, writing for the Court, disagreed with every last one of Wells Fargo’s arguments.  First, the Court held that there was no “unfairness or irregularity” in the foreclosure process, so the Court affirmed the district court’s rejection of Wells Fargo’s equitable argument.  Second, the Court held that UFTA does not apply because regularly conducted, noncollusive foreclosure sales are exempt from that statute.  Third, the Court agreed with the district court’s conclusion that an irregularity in the foreclosure deed upon sale does not invalidate the foreclosure as a whole.  Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court’s decision to award title to Radecki in yet another triumph for The Wright Law Group, P.C.

This Decision Helps Protect Purchasers From Banks Looking To Invalidate Purchasers’ Superior Title To A Property

By upholding a valid foreclosure sale, this decision helps protect purchasers from banks looking to invalidate purchasers’ superior title to a property.  More broadly, the Court’s decision is an important reminder to the lower courts that purchasers’ property rights must be vindicated.  This decision gives purchasers who purchase a property at a foreclosure sale renewed confidence that their title to the property will be honored by the judiciary, free and clear of the banks, who are extinguished by operation of law at the HOA foreclosure sales.  Banks may try to bully innocent purchasers, but The Wright Law Group, P.C. stands in the way and hits the biggest banks back.

If you have questions about an HOA matter or home foreclosure, call The Wright Law Group today.  Our attorneys will review your case with you.  With over 25 years of experience in litigation, The Wright Law Group, P.C. is well-equipped to assist you. Call us now at (702) 405-0001 to arrange a consultation.

Tags: Banks Come After Innocent PurchasersQuiet Title
Share
1

Recent Posts

  • Demand A Jury Trial In A Nevada Administrative Proceeding February 6, 2025
  • Nevada Mechanics Materialsmans Lien July 20, 2019
  • NV Supreme Court Published Opinion September 29, 2018
  • Changes In Record Sealing October 31, 2017
  • NRS 116 Does Not Conflict With FHA Mortgages August 2, 2017
  • Wright Law Group Victory HOA Cases Nevada August 1, 2017
  • Nevada Supreme Court Issues New Decisions On HOA Super Priority Liens March 17, 2016
  • Recovery Of Attorney’s Fees In Criminal Cases Attorney Las Vegas July 16, 2015
  • Banks Going After Homeowner’s Association (HOA) Foreclosure May 13, 2015
  • Las Vegas Civil Forfeiture Attorney October 13, 2014

Tags

Banks Come After Innocent Purchasers Banks going after Agencies Conducting Foreclosures Las Vegas Nevada banks ignoring super priority lien civil forfeiture attorney Contractor Liens Defendant Recover Attorneys Fees financial institutions First Deed of Trust HOA HOA Attorney HOA foreclosures Home Owners Association Las Vegas HOA Lawyer litigation expenses Mechanics liens Nevada Liens Laws Nevada Supreme Court nevada Supreme Court Ruling FHA Mortgagas Quiet Title Recent Record Sealing Changes Shorter Waiting Super Priority Lien Supreme Court Retroactivity Trial In A Nevada Administrative Proceeding
Contact The Wright Law Group, PC CLICK FOR CONTACT PAGE

CLICK TESTIMONIALS

TESTIMONIALS

Contact Info

  • John Henry Wright
  • The Wright Law Group, P.C.
  • 2340 Paseo Del Prado Building D Suite 305 Las Vegas NV 89102
  • (702) 405-0001

SEARCH SITE

logo martidale hubbell preeminent

Legal Disclaimer

The opinions expressed at or through this Web site are the opinions of the individual author and are for informational purposes only.  The information is not for the purpose of providing legal advice and is not to be acted on as such.  Communication of information by, in, to or through this Web site and your receipt or use of it is not provided in the course of and does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between The Wright Law Group, P.C. and the browser.  Nor is it intended as a solicitation.  It is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney.  You should not act upon any such information without first seeking qualified professional counsel on your specific matter.  The hiring of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon Web site communications or advertisements.  The materials presented in this Web site are intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be current, or up to date and should not be taken as an indication of future results.

Social Connect

© 2023 · The Wright Law Group, P.C.

Site Design by Digi Dezine

  • Home
  • Testimonials
  • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
Prev Next

Press Enter to search · Esc to close